AMD does not believe it has breached the cross-licensing agreement, and the company believes intel`s allegations of infringement are in bad faith. Should Intel`s request prove to be in bad faith, AMD says it gives them "the right to terminate Intel`s rights and licenses… retaining the company`s rights and licenses under the Cross License Agreement. Asked about the ip-sharing agreement that would allow companies to use each other`s patents, Otellini said that little had changed from the previous agreement. "There really is no change on the patent side," he said. "There was a clause that limited outsourcing capacity under certain conditions. [This] has been withdrawn from the agreement. They are free to use everyone they want to build. In its 8K filing, AMD states that it has received the allegation of a substantial violation from Intel; During a conversation with Harry Wolin, AMD`s senior vice president, Ars learned that Intel claims that Globalfoundries was not qualified as a subsidiary of AMD based on an edited part of the cross-licensing agreement.
AMD notes that it has initiated the "intensifying dispute resolution process." AMD has filed a Form 8-K with the SEC, which advises the agency in a licensing dispute between itself and Intel. However, in discussions with Ars, AMD also stressed that neither it nor Globalfoundries really need the cross-licensing agreement to design or manufacture x86-compatible microprocessors. This is a surprising statement that runs counter to the general understanding of what the AMD/Intel Cross licensing agreement authorizes or contains. Has Intel`s possession/strangulation of the right to manufacture x86 processors been widely misunderstood for years? Once Intel tries to use AMD GPUs` hardware design IP, they need a license immediately as will from AMD. "[The agreement] is the culmination of many years of litigation and regulatory interference, and we are optimistic that it is ushering in a new era for our industry," Meyer said. "We would like to thank regulators around the world for their diligence and consistency. Your work has allowed us to reach this milestone." There will be quarterly meetings between companies to resolve disputes, he said, with agreed mediation and conciliation measures. "We will settle [these disputes] as businessmen and not in court," he said. I will link the whole agreement below, note that there are parts that have been deducted on the basis of confidential information.
This means that no one will be able to give a 100% real answer when it comes to this. AMD and Intel have entered into a cross-licensing agreement that ensures that companies will not engage in litigation over possible patent infringements. The agreement covers the entire patent portfolio for both companies, which includes multi-purpose processors, graphics adapters and other intellectual property rights. For example, AMD can design and sell microprocessors compatible with the x86 intel control architecture with a variety of extensions, while Intel can develop and ship centralized processing units using IP and extensions originally created by AMD. The cross-licensing agreement has a number of conditions and restrictions. For example, chip developers are not allowed to build processors that are compatible with competitors` infrastructure (for example, plugs. B, motherboards, etc.). In addition, if AMD and Intel change their owner, the contract has been terminated.